California Assembly Bill 316: The Delay for Driverless Trucks on Highways Until 2031

California Assembly Bill 316 Could Delay Driverless Trucks on Highways Until 2031

Key Take-Aways:

  • California’s Assembly Bill 316 could delay the deployment of driverless trucks on state highways
  • The bill would require a human driver to be present in autonomous trucks until at least 2031
  • This legislation aims to address safety concerns and provide more time for regulatory oversight

A new bill proposed in California, known as Assembly Bill 316, has the potential to put the brakes on the deployment of driverless trucks on state highways. If passed, this bill would mandate that autonomous trucks cannot operate without a human driver present until at least 2031. The goal behind this legislation is to address safety concerns and ensure that there is adequate time for regulators to develop proper oversight and assessment protocols.

Assembly Bill 316 reflects the cautious approach taken by lawmakers in response to the rapid advancements in driverless technology. While autonomous trucks have the potential to revolutionize the trucking industry by improving efficiency and reducing costs, there are legitimate concerns regarding their safety and reliability. This bill, therefore, aims to strike a balance between embracing innovation and ensuring public safety.

By requiring a human driver to be present in autonomous trucks, California legislators want to ensure that there is a failsafe mechanism in place to handle emergency situations or technological failures. This requirement acts as an additional layer of protection to prevent accidents and minimize the potential risks associated with the operation of driverless trucks.

Hot Take:

While some may perceive Assembly Bill 316 as a setback for the trucking industry’s technological advancements, it is crucial to remember that safety should always be the top priority. Instead of rushing into widespread implementation of driverless trucks, it is prudent to take a cautious and methodical approach. By providing more time for regulatory oversight and requiring human presence in autonomous vehicles, California is taking a responsible stance towards ensuring the well-being of its citizens. Let us not forget the adage: “Better safe than sorry.”

This blog post has been generated using the information provided in the article:”Driverless Trucks Face Regulatory Opposition in California” by “Ricardo Cano”.

Check it out at:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Why Subscribe?

  1. Industry Leading Products
  2. Information
  3. Education
  4. Tradeshow Alerts
  5. More, but we can’t share that yet.

Tell Us About You 👇🏽

* indicates required